Guys, today I’m really excited because I finally have the Vivo X200 Ultra with me, which is arguably the best camera smartphone in the world. Why do I say that? Because Vivo has cleverly used a combination of hardware and software to produce results that look very impressive. But the question really is, is it actually more impressive than the Oppo Findex 8 Ultra and the iPhone 16 Pro Max? A phone that Vivo themselves compared at the launch event. I’ll give you the answer to that question by the end of this article.
If you’re reading this for the first time, I’m Ashad. This is Track and Tech English, your destination for detailed, incensive gadget reviews. Now, I must talk about the Vivo X200 Ultra’s camera setup first. It uses the same Sony Lydia 818 sensor, the 50MP sensor that was used even in the X200 Pro. But Vivo has made this very important change where it has switched out the 23mm 24mm standard wide lens that you get on most phones for a 35 mm lens. Plus, there’s gimbal OS stabilization on top of it. Trust me, this is every camera nerd’s bed dream come true. Because the amount of times I’ve heard people tell me, “Oh, why don’t smartphone manufacturers use 35 mm lenses?” Well, Vivo has done it.
Now, to add to that camera setup, Vivo has also used the same Sony Litia 818 sensor for the ultra wideangle camera with which Vivo actually does a 2x in sensor crop to get a 28 mm lens so that you don’t miss out on that wide frame either. There’s also that 200 megapixel Samsung HP9 sensor with 85mm attached lens. Now, here’s some interesting math for you. With the X200 Pro, you get the same sensor for the telephoto camera or the periscope camera. And attached to that periscope camera is also an 85 mm lens. But when you do the calculation with the primary camera, which is a 23 mm lens camera on the Vivo X200 Pro, you actually get a magnification of 3.7x. At the same time, when you look at the X200 Ultra, it’s a magnification of 2.5x. That’s not it. You also get a 50MP selfie camera. There’s a dedicated camera control button obviously.
And there are two dedicated chips like apart from the Snapdragon 8 Elite that’s inside and the ISP that it uses specifically for imaging which is basically the VS1 chip and the V3 Plus chip. The VS1 chip will be used for raw data processing and the V3 Plus will be used for algorithm tuning. Now, this is a completely mad mad mad setup. And when you add that camera kit and that teleprompter lens, that Zeiss made lens, which actually increases the magnification to 8.7x, it’s insane. Honestly, unfortunately, I don’t have the teleprompter lens, so I didn’t test that out. But anyway, here’s a handy comparison chart for you to see all the camera specs of all the three phones that I’m going to be comparing.
Primary Camera Comparison
Now to start off, we’ll look at the photos taken by the primary camera on all the three phones at their default focal length. So the iPhone has a 24mm and Oppo has 23 mm and Vivo has 35 mm. And Vivo’s 35 mm lens actually works wonders because you get excellent detail retention at 100% crop despite having a smaller sensor than Oppo’s 1 in sensor. Vivo has a 1x 1.28 in sensor. And when you compare the 24 megapixel outputs of Oppo and iPhone, which is basically what both these phones can do, OPPO actually offers more details and sharper textures thanks to the larger sensor.
Now, when you switch to the 35 mm on iPhone and Oppo, they’re not nearly as good as Vivo. And between the OPPO and iPhone, actually, the iPhone is better here. Vivo would be number one when it comes to detail retention for me, followed by Oppo and then Apple.
Low Light Performance
All right, now switching to low light. All the three are fantastic here. But iPhone’s color edition is spoton. Whether it’s the greens or the night sky, they look accurate here. But when it comes to detail retention at 100% crop, both the Findex 8 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Pro are kind of toe to toe. iPhones is the softest and weakest here. So with that 1x 1.28 in sensor on the X200 Ultra along with the 35 mm lens that it’s using, the kind of details that you are getting is actually something that I didn’t expect. It could also be because it’s got those dedicated chips for processing as well. Whatever it is, Vivo is doing a fantastic job.
And when you look at the ultra low light scenes like this one, Vivo just decimates the competition here. The noise correction and detail detention is topnotch. Oppo struggles generally in such scenes. Uh and in comparison, iPhone is actually not bad, but it’s a little too noisy. So overall, when you look at it, we was the best even for low light and Apple and Oppo would be matched here.
Ultra Wideangle Shots
All right, now time to talk about those ultra wideangle shots because there are some interesting things to note here as well. Firstly, the iPhone is the worst of the lot. Unlike the primary camera, you do not get 24 megapixel outputs from the ultra wideangle camera on the iPhone, unfortunately. But Oppo gives you proper 24 megapixel outputs from the ultra wide as well. And this means that the detail retention at 100% crop is insane.
Now, when you match the crop on Oppo and Vivo, despite Vivo having a large sensor, OPPO is actually better here because Vivo’s algorithm oversharpens the ultra wide pictures a lot and that is clearly visible from the micro details. Having said that, that new ultra wide angle sensor on the X200 Ultra is absolutely kick-ass in low light ultra wide shots. It pulls in the most amount of details obviously and the second best is OPPO here.
Zoom Shots Comparison
All right, now time to compare the zoom shots using the periscope and the telephoto cameras on these phones basically. But I’m going to switch things around a little bit. What I’m going to do is actually going to compare the focal length equivalent to a full frame just to maintain my sanity. And I’ll tell you why. Because if I were to do a 2x, 3x, 5x, 10x, 30x comparison, then it would have been difficult for me to explain and for you to understand. Because for example, the 2X on the iPhone is 48 mm and the 2X on the OPPO is 46 mm, which is comparable, but the 2X on the Vivo is 70 mm. So, you see the kind of problem that’s there.
Now, starting off with the 70 mm comparison, Oppo leads the pack once again because of the fact that it actually has 24 megapixel outputs. You get the most amount of details with the Findex 8 Ultra and the 2x in sensor crop which goes to about 70 mm on the X200 Ultra is the second best here and then it’s followed by the iPhone which is the worst of the three. At 85 mm, Vivo’s dedicated 200 megapixel Samsung HP9 sensor is the most detailed followed by Oppo and then the iPhone.
At 120 mm or 5x on the iPhone, I expected the iPhone to have an easy victory because of the dedicated lens. But well, Vivo beats in fair and square thanks to that AI sharpening that it’s doing. In fact, it even beats the OPPO here. Next, we move on to 135 mm or the 6x dedicated lens on Oppo. Here, I realized Vivo’s flaw with the AI upscaling of the image. The sharpening is a little overdone and Oppo looks more realistic here. But still, even Vivo’s photo will look very, very good to an untrained eye. So, basically, both are almost equally good.
Now, next, let’s take a look at the 668 mm range. At these long zoom ranges, the AI starts going into overdrive on the Oppo and Vivo. It looks overprocessed from the get-go, but the processing offers better sharpening on Oppo since it doesn’t haze out the details like Vivo does. Obviously, the iPhone is no match here, so I’m not even talking about it. But the digital zoom kind of looks natural here.
Now, at even further zoom ranges, like for example, the 1335 mm that you see over here, I don’t know. It’s right now boiling down to what kind of AI processing you prefer. You prefer Vivos processing or OPOS processing here. Both actually don’t recreate the scene very authentically. I feel like Xiaomi 15 Ultra actually does a better job.
Low Light Zoom
Now moving on to low light zoom. At 70 mm, Oppo is the best, followed by Vivo and then iPhone. At 85 mm, while Vivo does have an edge here, Oppo is nearly as good. I’d say 99% there and that is a huge win for low light zoom on the Findex 8 Ultra. At 120 mm, Vivo takes a win again, followed by Oppo and then Apple. At 135 mm, Oppo 6X comes in clutch and it takes a win once again.
In my opinion, after looking at the photos, I’d probably go with Oppo here for zoom performance. Vivo following it very closely in second position and iPhone like somewhere there. Now, obviously, I haven’t tested the teleconverter zoom lens that you can attach to the Vivo X200 Ultra. If you were to do that, then you will definitely get way better zoom pictures with the X200 Ultra. I’d love to do that sometime.
HDR Processing
Now, moving on to HDR processing. I felt like Vivo’s multistack processing is superior. While all three look good at first glance, only when you look at the 100% crop do the cracks start developing. Especially with the iPhone, you can see that it tends to blow out the brightest portions in the image. And when there’s a tree in the front with the harsh backlighting, you can notice some chromatic aberration as well. I saw some purple fringing.
Oppo is almost as good as Vivo except for the shadow region where Vivo pulls out more details. And the same analysis is true for HDR samples that I captured with the ultra wideangle camera as you can see for yourself. And when you’re capturing people against harsh backlight, the iPhone just falters really badly. Now, a lot of people will have a tendency to say that, hey, this is probably what it looks like. This is very natural looking. Actually, it’s not. What I saw was much better and it was very well reproduced by Vivo and Oppo. In fact, Vivo and Oppo’s HDR algorithm seems to be much better here with me preferring Vivo slightly better.
But the thing to note here is that Apple’s smart HDR algorithm at one point used to be one of the best in the industry. right now is lagging behind the Chinese counterparts when it comes to HDR multistack processing.
Color Reproduction and Skin Tones
Now talking about color reproduction, it is the closest to accurate or you know closest to neutral on Vivo with the Zeiss tuning. And truth be told, unless you peak intently, you can’t find the difference between the iPhone and Vivo. They look rather similar. The difference is that the iPhone is a touch warmer to make it look slightly more attractive, but yeah, very good color reproduction here. The same is true for skin tones as well. By the way, Oppo messes it up entirely in the skin tone rendition. While Vivo is close to neutral, iPhone actually kind of wins here if you ask me.
Portraits
Now, I captured portraits at 35mm, 50 mm, 85 mm, and 135 mm on the Vivo and Oppo and 120 mm on the iPhone. While all three are pretty good at creating that beautiful bokeh drop off that tries to mimic a DSLR, Vivo’s edge detection is so freaking good that I was shocked that it managed to pull out a single strand of air in the semantic segmentation. Vivo was just killing it. Skin tones are again closest to natural on the iPhone, followed by Vivo and then OPPO.
In low light portraits, Vivo just decimates the competition. It is incredible. You get the most amount of details, the best edge cutout with each individual strand of hair picked out and just an incredible portrait quality overall. Of course, with the best exposure and beautiful colors as well.
Selfies
As far as selfies go, all three are absolutely top class. iPhone has again the best skin tones here. iPhone does a good job with skin tones, trust me. Vivo and Oppo are a touch warm, but these two do pull out more details than the iPhone. Let that be known. HDR selfies are the best on the iPhone here. And when you look at low light selfies, Oppo is the best, followed by Vivo and then iPhone. Actually, that’s also true for selfie portraits. So, overall, when you look at it, the Findex 8 Ultra actually has a little bit of an edge when you look at the selfie pictures compared to iPhone and the X200 Ultra.
Video Recording
All right. Now, I’m going to be talking about video recording next. And for that let me make one thing abundantly clear is the fact that I’m going to be showing you SDR video comparison first and after that I’ll talk about Dolby Vision and there’s a reason for it. Now all three are fantastic at 4K 60 fps using the primary camera. Although in daylight I feel like Vivo has a slight edge here simply because you get a higher bit rate video recording and better gimbal stabilization. Sound recording is the best on Oppo followed by Vivo and then the iPhone. I never thought I’d see this day where iPhone would actually face tough competition from the Chinese counterparts.
Now, we’re recording a video at 4K 60 fps using the primary camera on all the three phones. Unfortunately, the X200 Ultra’s crop is a 35mm crop, so it’s a close crop. Uh whereas you get a wider frame on the other two. Now, this is an SDR video. This is not a Dolby Vision video.
In low light video recording, all the three are again so good. Vivo does have some noise, but it does offer more details compared to the iPhone. Oppo is the most detailed and sharpest of the three in low light video, but the lens flare correction in Vivo is just top class. Ultimate video recording quality is the best on Vivo followed by Oppo and then the iPhone.
By the way, Vivo has also done a good job of, you know, smoothing out the jankiness that you would get when you’re zooming into an image and the lens switching would happen. Yeah, it’s done a good job of it. It’s much cleaner with the zoom now, but still, iPhone is the king here. Oppo is just very janky. Also, the zoom video quality is not very good on the OPPO. Vivo is just mad good here. and i